“Today’s episode is based upon an article by Dr. Jaime Hoerricks, a former forensic scientist and current teacher, who argues that the term “evidence-based” in education is often misused and fails to meet the standards of real science. Dr. Hoerricks draws parallels between the misuse of scientific evidence in courtrooms and the current educational landscape, where interventions and curricula are branded as “evidence-based” without demonstrating reliability, repeatability, and reproducibility. They critique an EdWeek article for promoting uncritical acceptance of educational research and examines how initiatives like the so-called ‘Science of Reading’ and autism interventions can prioritise profit and compliance over genuine scientific rigor and student needs. Ultimately, Dr. Hoerricks urges educators to demand proof and critically evaluate the “evidence” presented to them, much like the scrutiny applied in forensic science and the courts, to avoid harming students with ineffective practices.”
Here’s the link to the source article: https://open.substack.com/pub/autside/p/the-verdict-is-in-evidence-based
Let me know what you think.
Share this post